TRIG PORTFOLIO

Caption:

These are the trig notes that I believe need the most improvement. First of all, there is no title. This is a major fault. If I were to be flipping through my binder I would have no way of quickly determining what the notes were for. Additionally, these notes look sloppy. The handwriting is poor and there is no order or consistency. The notes are dated and the content makes sense, but improvements could definitely be made. For example, at one point I wrote "Basically the same for cosine." What is that supposed to mean? Are the rules identical for cosine, or are there things that are different? If there are changes, what are they? I should not have been so vague with that statement. Another example of my faulty note-taking can be seen when looking at pages 2 and 3. The fact that there are graphs as examples is definitely a good thing, but these graphs lack labels. There are functions and graphs, but barely any notes regarding how I got from the function to the graph. If I were struggling with this topic, I would regret not having more descriptions and instructions.